You are here
Home >> Latest Posts >> News >> POV: Google sells off Motorola to Lenovo. What it means for Microsoft-Nokia?

POV: Google sells off Motorola to Lenovo. What it means for Microsoft-Nokia?

Moto-GoogleThe news that Google is now selling off Motorola business to Lenovo, for what looks like a much smaller sum of $2.9 billion sets one immediately into thinking mode. Reason is pretty clear, Google-Motorola deal had many parallels to Microsoft-Nokia deal. In both cases, iconic hardware companies were sold to software giants. Google in spite of owning Android and investing lots of money couldn’t turn the Motorola phone business around and finally has called it quits. So, what does it mean for Microsoft-Nokia D&S deal?

In fact, the similarities between two deals end here. When Google bought Motorola, Samsung was already the leading Android manufacturer and Motorola was struggling. But in case of MS-Nokia, Nokia owns close to 90% of the small Windows Phone sales. So, Microsoft will have the ability to control and modify the Windows Phone landscape the way it wants after owning Nokia’s Devices and Services division.

However, if we analyze why Google-Motorola failed in their mission to succeed in the Android market dominated by Samsung, it may serve some lessons to Microsoft going ahead.

In spite of Google’s money and Android ownership, Motorola never could come up with a coherent strategy of attacking market at all ends, was too slow and only during last few months was able to generate some buzz with Moto X and Moto G. But that was too late! The reason behind their failure are many. No Motorola device has been able to topple Samsung’s flagships in desirability quotient and are constantly complained missing the X-factor. Initial devices were lackluster in specs and overall quality. Even the recent ones which came with impressive specs, were no match to competition in areas like camera, design and add-on features.

Microsoft may need to speed up thing in terms of software and features delivery and bringing the platform as close to competition as possible. While specs wise with likes of Lumia 1520, the catch-up has been done, adding that X-factor is still left. The Windows Phone software still misses many desired features and while it is top-notch in smoothness and performance, it may still help if the future software help in ironing out some quirks like settings access, no toggles, notification center etc.

For Microsoft much more is on stake as compared to Google, if its Nokia’s D&S acquisition fails. Google still owns Android, even if it gets rid of Motorola business. But Microsoft has to make it work somehow for securing its future, and some handy lessons can be learn from Google’s mishandling of Motorola!

Nayan has more than 10 years of experience of covering Technology and innovations. He is a big Nokia fan and Tech disruptions aficionado. He loves to review new cool gadgets and writing about Android, iOS, Gadgets and general Technology stuff. He has been associated with other well-known Tech sites WinCentral and GadgetOx since long. He currently sports a Lumia 950 XL and Nexus 5X. Other interests include listening to Nu-Metal Hits and Kick-Boxing. Write to him at Email: [email protected]
  • JLIT99

    The Moto X and G were gaining some limited traction in the market. I think the deal was part of a pact with Samsung (as they are rumoured to move back towards stock Android). I hope Lenovo leaves Moto to continue making great devices, and doesn’t push bloatware into the devices.

    If Google couldn’t change the market with devices running (arguably) the best operating system, it really should raise concerns for MS, who essentially have a much worse deal. Google had Moto, a historic brand name as an asset when selling devices but all Microsoft has is the Lumia brand.

    Whether the Lumia brand without Nokia stands out in the market is yet to be determined. When I use my L520, my friends refer to it as a “Nokia”. The Lumia brand name seems to be less well known.

    • Kamal

      Someone convinced them into believing that Lumia is a strong enough brand to sustain itself, without Nokia. Thought it is good for Nokia’s future prospects!

    • Forgive me, but it is very artificial statement. Motorola doesn’t have in its non disputable historic brand half of Nokia’s shining quality. About the Lumia it is another name of Nokia. By the way for windows phone users it is much better to have one supplier.

      • JLIT99

        Nadir, regardless – the Motorola brand is more recognisable here in Europe than Lumia.
        Nokia obviously is a better brand but MS isn’t going to be making any Lumias under that name. So all the goodwill and nostalgia is not applicable.

        People do remember the Motorola Razr here in Europe as it was an iconic phone. The Lumia has not received that kind of fame (and I can’t see it recieving it any time soon unfortunately). Almost no one knows what a Lumia is here on its own.

  • Good article. Thanks.

    • Kamal

      Thanks for reading the article and for posting such nice comment 🙂